As government agencies sound the alarm about artificial intelligence risks, critical infrastructure sectors face mounting security challenges. The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), FBI, and NSA have issued urgent guidance highlighting the “unprecedented” vulnerabilities that AI systems create in essential services like water, energy, and transportation networks.
Federal officials warn that AI deployment brings unique risks that weren’t present in traditional systems. These include non-deterministic behaviors, hallucinations, and the possibility of malicious actors targeting AI components. The agencies stress that organizations must understand these risks and establish strong security expectations with AI vendors.
Critical infrastructure sectors already struggle with existing security weaknesses. Many water utilities operate on threadbare security budgets and lack dedicated security personnel. The rapid adoption of AI technologies without proper safeguards amplifies these vulnerabilities, creating openings for attackers. The shift from gut instinct to data-driven strategies increases dependency on AI systems that could be compromised. Resource disparities among critical infrastructure providers significantly impact their ability to implement AI risk management measures effectively.
Technical threats are evolving rapidly. Hackers now target AI models, training data, and frameworks. Recent campaigns have exploited vulnerabilities in open-source AI systems to execute malicious code. The multi-cloud environments often used for AI implementation create expanded attack surfaces for bad actors.
To combat these threats, federal guidance recommends thorough testing before implementation and continuous validation of AI systems. Organizations should implement human-in-the-loop protocols for oversight and maintain strong boundaries between AI systems and critical operations. The joint international guidance emphasizes the importance of four key principles for safely adopting AI in operational technology environments.
Government response continues to evolve. A November 2024 Department of Homeland Security document breaks down AI roles in infrastructure, while the July AI Action Plan expands security warning sharing. An executive order directs sector risk management agencies to assess AI-specific threats.
Perhaps most concerning is that only 24% of generative AI projects currently incorporate security measures. Officials emphasize that AI governance must include clear use procedures, accountability frameworks, and failsafe mechanisms. They particularly caution against using large language models for safety-critical decisions in operational technology environments where failures could have catastrophic consequences.
References
- https://www.cybersecuritydive.com/news/ai-critical-infrastructure-government-guidance/807052/
- https://cset.georgetown.edu/publication/securing-critical-infrastructure-in-the-age-of-ai/
- https://www.hstoday.us/subject-matter-areas/infrastructure-security/rising-threats-to-critical-infrastructure-in-the-u-s/
- https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/2025-threat-intelligence-index
- https://cyberscoop.com/ai-cybersecurity-guidance-critical-infrastructure-op-ed/
- https://redbotsecurity.com/2025-cyber-breach-year-in-review/
- https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Cybersecurity_Outlook_2025.pdf
- https://www.oligo.security/academy/ai-security-risks-in-2025-6-threats-6-defensive-measures