While the SEC finally admits that regular crypto staking isn’t a security, they’re still blocking ETF providers from doing the exact same thing. The hypocrisy is almost impressive.
On May 29, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance dropped some long-awaited guidance. Self-staking, delegated staking, custodial, non-custodial – none of it counts as securities. They even threw in the fancy term “Protocol Staking Activities” to make it official. No registration needed. Early withdrawal options? Fine. Bundled rewards? No problem. Slashing protection? Still not a security.
SEC says staking isn’t a security anymore – self-staking, delegated, custodial, whatever. No registration needed.
This is a complete 180 from the Gensler era, when the SEC sued anything that moved in the staking space. Remember those enforcement actions? Yeah, those aged well. The new Crypto Task Force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, is supposedly working on actual regulations. About time.
But here’s where it gets weird. ETF providers want to stake their crypto holdings – the exact same staking the SEC just blessed – and suddenly the Commission has concerns. They’re blocking modifications to existing crypto ETFs, claiming they need to “make progress on custody and other issues” first. Right. The SEC has delayed decisions on both Bitwise’s staking ETF application and Grayscale’s XRP ETF filing.
The SEC’s filing says proceedings don’t mean they’ve reached conclusions. Translation: We’re stalling because we can. Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw even dissented, arguing the guidance contradicts court precedents and misrepresents investor protections.
Industry folks are trying to stay diplomatic. RedStone’s co-founder Marcin Kazmierczak called the guidance “evolutionary rather than transformative.” That’s generous. The Crypto Council for Innovation spent years explaining that staking isn’t investing – it’s just how proof-of-stake blockchains work. The SEC finally listened, sort of.
ETF Opportunities Trust filed their Form N-1A on May 30, probably hoping to capitalize on the new guidance. Good luck with that.
The message is clear: Regular people can stake all they want. Professional fund managers offering the same service in a regulated wrapper? That’s somehow different. The SEC admits staking isn’t a security, but won’t let ETFs do it anyway.
Makes perfect sense if you don’t think about it. The crypto industry wanted clarity. They got contradictions instead. At least they’re consistent about being inconsistent.
References
- https://natlawreview.com/article/sec-staff-green-lights-various-staking-activities
- https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/crenshaw-statement-crypto-asset-security-status-053125
- https://cointelegraph.com/news/sec-crypto-staking-guidance-win-crypto-regulations
- https://cryptoslate.com/sec-removes-key-hurdle-for-ethereum-etfs-by-exempting-staking-from-securities-rules/
- https://blockworks.co/news/sec-staking-etf-objection-implications