When Illinois Governor JB Pritzker signed HB 1806 into law on August 1, 2025, the state became the first in America to tell AI chatbots to shut up and stop playing therapist. The Wellness and Oversight for Psychological Resources Act passed unanimously. Both parties agreed on something. Miracle.
The law is blunt: only licensed humans can provide therapy. Period. No AI chatbots pretending to understand your childhood trauma. No algorithms making treatment decisions. Companies caught letting their digital “therapists” treat actual humans face $10,000 fines per violation. That’s per patient, per session. Math gets ugly fast.
Only licensed humans can provide therapy in Illinois—AI chatbots face $10,000 fines per violation
Why the harsh crackdown? Simple. AI chatbots kept screwing up in spectacular ways. The Washington Post reported one recommended a drug relapse to a fictional addict in May. Nice. Reports surfaced of people in crisis turning to AI instead of real therapists, sometimes with dangerous results. Lawmakers figured maybe, just maybe, mental health care should involve actual trained humans who understand consequences.
The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation enforces this beast. They’re drawing clear lines: AI can schedule your therapy appointment, take notes, handle billing. That’s it. The moment AI starts asking about your feelings or suggesting coping strategies, boom—violation. Licensed therapists can’t even use AI to generate treatment plans without reviewing every detail first. AI lacks conscience and accountability, unable to face legal repercussions when things go wrong.
This move slaps against the Trump administration‘s proposed 10-year freeze on new state AI regulations. Illinois doesn’t care. They’re setting precedent while other states watch nervously. Digital mental health companies are scrambling, forced to redesign their entire Illinois operations or pack up entirely.
OpenAI and others are trying to detect mental distress in users, but Illinois already decided that’s not enough. The law took effect immediately—no grace period, no exceptions. Regulatory officials claim they’re “prioritizing patient care above all else,” which sounds noble enough.
The message is crystal clear: in Illinois, therapy remains stubbornly human. No amount of sophisticated programming changes that. Other states might follow suit, creating a patchwork of regulations that’ll make digital health companies dizzy. For now, Illinois stands alone, wielding $10,000 fines like a club against anyone who thinks a chatbot can replace a therapist.
References
- https://www.engadget.com/ai/illinois-is-the-first-state-to-ban-ai-therapists-145755797.html
- https://slashdot.org/story/25/08/05/148238/an-illinois-bill-banning-ai-therapy-has-been-signed-into-law
- https://statescoop.com/illinois-bans-ai-mental-health-services/
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVhuFmeq7xs
- https://www.ilga.gov/Legislation/BillStatus?DocTypeID=HB&DocNum=1806&LegID=159219